OC 06-0960 MONTH FOLLOW UP OF A TWO DOSE HPV-4 VACCINE SCHEDULE; RESULTS FROM A PHASE III POST-LICENSURE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

05. HPV prophylactic vaccines
S. Dobson 1, G. Ogilvie 1, C. Sauvageau 2, M. Dionne 2, V. Gilca 2, S. Mcneil 3, M. Krajden 1, D. Money 1.
1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada), 2Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec (Canada), 3Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia (Canada)

Background / Objectives

In a phase III randomized trial, 2 doses of quadrivalent HPV (HPV-4) given to 9-13 year old girls (0,6months (M)) was non-inferior to 3 doses given to 16-26 year old women (0,2,6M).   In the original trial, we also included a 3 dose arm for girls 9-13 year old (0,2,6M).  In this study, we report the 60M follow up after first dose for the 2- and 3-dose girls.


Methods

Participants provided a blood sample at 60M. Sera were evaluated using Merck Competitive Luminex ImmunoAssay (cLIA) and total IgG LIA (Luminex Immunoassay) assays to assess serum antibodies to HPV-6,11,16 and 18.  Seropositivity (SP) rates and geometric mean titre (GMT) for genotypes were compared between 2- and 3-dose recipients. The 2-sample t-test with unequal variances was used to compute p-values.


Results

101 girls provided blood samples (50:2 dose;51:3 dose group).  With the exception of HPV-18, seropositivity was >95% for other genotypes.  There was no significant difference in seropositivity between 2 and 3 dose girls.  There was no significant difference in GMTs using IgG or cLIA between 2- and 3-dose recipients with the exception of HPV-18 cLIA (p=0.04).

Type Assay 2 Dose SP % (95%CI)  3 Dose SP % (95%CI) 2 Dose GMT* (95%CI) 3 Dose GMT*(95%CI)
6 cLIA 96 (86-100) 98 (90-100) 150 (114-198) 205 (157-269)
6 IgG 100 (93-100) 100 (93-100) 207 (147-291) 242 (180-327)
11 cLIA 100 (93-100) 100 (93-100) 223 (167-298) 225 (174-289)
11 IgG 98 (89-100) 98 (90-100) 163 (120-220) 170 (125-230)
16 cLIA 100(93-100) 100 (93-100) 949 (691-1304) 829 (628-1094)
16 IgG 100 (93-100) 100 (93-100) 904 (668-1223) 735 (541-998)
18 cLIA 84 (71-93) 94 (84-99) 78 (53-117) 137 (94-198)
18 IgG 86 (73-94) 92 (81-98) 107 (73-158) 143 (99-204)

*GMT for cLIA and LIA is expressed as milli Merck Units/ml 


Conclusion

At 60M post dose 1, there was no significant difference in SP or GMTs between 2- and 3-doses girls ages 9-13 year, with the exception of HPV-18 cLIA GMTs.  HPV-18 IgG GMTs however, were not significantly different.  2- and 3-dose SP remains relatively unchanged from the 36M rates in these groups (data not shown).  This analysis provides reassurance for programs using 2 doses HPV-4 that immunogenicity is comparable to 3-doses at 60M after dose 1. These study participants are also a subgroup of a larger cohort under evaluation for effectiveness of the 2-dose HPV-4 vaccine, which will provide further guidance regarding the impact of reduced dose schedules.


References