P17-08IS THERE EVIDENCE FOR CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING IN ELDERLY WOMEN?

08. Screening methods
L.H. Thamsborg 1, M. Waldstrøm 2, H. Svanholm 3, C. Rygaard 4, E. Lynge 1.
1Department of Public Health; University of Copenhagen (Denmark), 2Pathology Department, Vejle Hospital (Denmark), 3Pathology Department, Randers Hospital (Denmark), 4Pathology Department, Hvidovre Hospital (Denmark)

Background / Objectives

In Denmark, screening for cervical cancer with liquid-based cytology (LBC) is offered every three years in the age-group 23-49 years, and every five years in women aged 50-64 years. For women aged 60-64 years cytology screening can be replaced by an HPV- DNA test, and the woman is checked-out of the screening programme if she is HPV negative. At present, the age-specific incidence of cervical cancer in Denmark shows a bipolar pattern with peaks both in younger and older ages. A considerable part of new cases and deaths from cervical cancer occur in women over 60 years of age. It has, therefore, been suggested to increase the upper age-limit for cervical cancer screening.


Methods

We analyzed incidence and mortality from cervical cancer and data on screening participation in women 64+ years. Data on incidence and mortality were extracted from Danish and Nordic registers. Data on screening participation were obtained from the Central Denmark Region, where 8,868 women 64+ years were invited to screening in 2014 to remedy a previous mistake in the invitation software.   


Results

The number of incident cervical cancer cases decreased from an average of 860 per year in 1958-62 to 372 in 2008-12, and the number of cervical cancer deaths decreased from an average of 320 per year in 1958-62 to 98 in 2008-12. During the same period, the age-standardized incidence (Nordic Standard Population) for women 60+ years decreased from 45.7 to 16.8 per 100,000 and mortality from 28.8 to 8 per 100,000. The relative share of cervical cancer cases in women 60+ years increased from 21% in 1958-62 to 30% in 2008-12. Analysis of incidence by birth cohort indicated that younger generations are expected to experience a considerably lower incidence level in older ages than the level seen at present in elderly women. Out of the 8,868 women 64+ years invited to screening in 2014, 11.3% participated and 5.5% of the participants were high-risk HPV-positive.


Conclusion

Today one third of new cervical cancer cases and two thirds of cervical cancer deaths occur in women 60+ years. However, the pattern we see today is a result of different cervical cancer risks across birth cohorts. The current incidence peak of cervical cancer in elderly women could motivate a one-time offer of HPV screening of women aged 65-79, but the evidence does not support a permanent change in the present screening programme because future generations of elderly women will have a lower risk of cervical cancer. 


References