WACC II-11SOCIAL MOBILIZATION, ACCEPTABILITY AND CONSENT DURING HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINATION IN LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES

32. Low resource settings
S. Kabakama 1, K.E. Gallagher 2, N. Howard 3, S. Mounier-Jack 3, H.E.D. Burchett 3, U.K. Griffiths 3, M. Feletto 4, D.S. Lamontagne 4, D. Watson-Jones 5.
1Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, National Institute for Medical Research, PO Box 11936, Mwanza, Tanzania (Tanzania, United republic of), 2Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7H, UK & Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, National Institute for Medical Research, PO Box 11936, Mwanza, Tanzania (United Kingdom), 3Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK (United Kingdom), 4PATH, Vaccine Access and Delivery, PO Box 900922, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA (United States), 5Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7H, UK & Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, National Institute for Medical Research, PO Box 11936, Mwanza, Tanzania (Tanzania, United republic of)

Background / Objectives

This study synthesizes experiences and lessons learnt around social mobilization, consent and acceptability from 55 HPV vaccine demonstration projects and 8 national programmes in 37 low and middle-income countries (LMIC) between January 2007 and January 2015.


Methods

The qualitative study design included: (i) a systematic review, in which 1,301 abstracts from five databases were screened and 41 publications included; (ii) soliciting 124 unpublished documents from governments and partner institutions; and (iii) conducting 27 key informant interviews. Data were extracted and analysed thematically. 


Results

Almost all experiences framed mobilization messages around vaccine-induced protection from cervical cancer, rather than prevention of a sexually transmitted infection. Rumours were consistent across world regions and largely focused on the effect of the vaccine on girls’ fertility. Experiences emphasized that it was critical to address rumours as soon as they emerged. Interactive communication with parents was more likely to achieve high uptake than non-interactive messaging. Political and/or celebrity champions proved useful in mobilizing both girls and their parents. Acceptability was generally determined by personal knowledge of the vaccine’s benefits, acceptance within the surrounding community, limited exposure to rumours and knowing where and when to go for vaccination. 


Conclusion

Social mobilization strategies and factors influencing HPV vaccine acceptance are consistent across world regions and projects/programmes. Thus, further formative research may not be required.  Countries introducing HPV vaccination or increasing coverage can learn from the available experiences, regardless of their economic status.


References