OC 12-06VALIDATION OF A NEW HPV SELF-SAMPLING DEVICE: THE CERVICAL AND SELF-SAMPLE IN SCREENING (CASSIS) STUDY

08. Screening methods
M. El-Zein 1, S. Bouten 1, K. Louvanto 1, L. Gilbert 2, W. Gotlieb 3, R. Hemmings 4, M. Behr 5, E. Franco 1.
1Division of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University (Canada), 2Gynecologic Cancer Service, McGill University Health Centre - Glen Site Cedars Cancer Centre (Canada), 3Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy, McGill University - Jewish General Hospital (Canada), 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Centre - St Mary’s Hospital Centre (Canada), 5Department of Microbiology, McGill University Health Centre (Canada)

Background / Objectives

Vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing can increase the coverage of cervical cancer screening programs. Our primary objective was to compare the diagnostic self-sampling performance of the newly designed HerSwab™ device (Eve Medical Inc.) with a physician-collected cervical sample for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer. We also compared the performance of HerSwab™ with the cobas® PCR Female swab.


Methods

Women (n=463) referred for colposcopy at McGill University affiliated hospitals collected two consecutive self-samples with the HerSwab™ and cobas® swabs, after receiving written and oral instructions. Randomization determined which swab was first. The colposcopist then collected a cervical sample and conducted a standard colposcopic examination with biopsies as appropriate. The HerSwab™ and physician-collected specimens were transferred to individual ThinPrep-containing vials. The cobas® swabs were suspended in cobas®PCR media. All samples were genotyped using the Roche’s cobas® 4800 HPV system. Agreement between collection methods was measured using the Kappa (k) statistic. Sensitivity and specificity and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the three HPV test results based on histological grades.


Results

Of the 463 women, 319 (68.9%) were classified as normal, 65 (14.0%) had CIN1, 31 (6.7%) had CIN2, 46 (9.9%) had CIN3 and 2 (0.4%) women had adenocarcinoma. We found very good agreement of HPV detection between the screening methods (HerSwab™ and physician: k=0.89 for HPV16, k=0.88 for HPV16/18, k=0.81 for any high-risk HPV; HerSwab™ and cobas® swabs: k=0.92 for HPV16, k=0.89 for HPV16/18, k=0.85 for any high-risk HPV). Sensitivity and specificity of any high-risk HPV for CIN2+ by HerSwab were 83.5% (95% CI: 75.4-91.7) and 52.9% (95% CI: 47.9-57.9), respectively. Corresponding values were 83.5% (95% CI: 75.4-91.7) and 48.4% (95% CI: 43.4-53.4) for the cobas® swab, and 91.1% (95% CI: 84.9-97.4) and 52.9% (95% CI: 47.9-57.9) for physician-collected samples.


Conclusion

Results from CASSIS demonstrate that HerSwab™ has a good agreement with physician sampling in detecting HPV genotypes, and adequate performance in detecting high-grade lesions. Its use could overcome some of the barriers to cytology, promoting cervical cancer prevention among unscreened and under-screened women.


References