P17-02CONCORDANCE BETWEEN SELF SAMPLING AND PROFESSIONALLY TAKEN CERVICAL HPV TEST- RESULT FROM A POPULATION BASED COHORT STUDY

08. Screening methods
L. Bergengren 1, G. Lillsunde Larsson 2, M. Kaliff 2, M.G. Karlsson 2, G. Helenius 2.
1Department of Women’s health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University (Sweden), 2Department Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University (Sweden)

Background / Objectives

In Örebro County, Sweden, the organized screening program includes women between 23 and 60. Women with normal cytology exit the program at 55-60 years of age. The aim of this study was to investigate if self-tests for elderly women could be an alternative to professionally taken samples.


Methods

All women (between 55-60) with normal cytology by liquid based cytology (LBC)  in their exit sample during the years 2012-2014, a total of 2027, were invited to participate in the study.  Retrospectively, all samples, previously biobanked at -25C, were genotyped for HPV with CLART HPV2 (Genomica), which detects 35 different low and high risk genotypes. 247 of 2027 women (12.2%) were positive for any of the 35 HPV genotypes. Of these, 154/247 carried an intermediate or high risk HPV according to the IARC classification, group 1 and 2A and B.

All 154 women were invited for a new cervical sampling, performed by a midwife, after a minimum of 6 months since the exit sample, and where at the same time given a self-sampling device, Rovers Evalyn brush, to use a week after the professional sampling.


Results

A total of 118 of the 154 women returned a self -test. Of these, 66 were positive for a group 1 or 2 genotype. For the professional sampling, the corresponding number was 70 (McNemar test p=0.557). 42 of the self-sampled tests were negative for HPV and 10 had low risk genotypes only.  Among the professionally collected samples, 40 were negative and 8 positive for low risk types.

The exact same result between professional and self-collected samples was seen in 67/118 samples (56.7%). Of those, 22 harbored an IARC group 1 genotype and 11 an IARC group 2 genotype. 31 samples were unanimously negative for HPV and 9 were concordant multi-infected samples.

Disconcordant results were noted in the remaining 51. Divergence was noted for both high and low risk results between the compared methods. Interestingly, 12 of the group 1 and 2 results in the self-collected samples could not be verified in the professionally collected samples. Also, 13 of group 1 and 2 results in the professional collected samples results were not found in the samples that were self-collected. 


Conclusion

Although cervical self-sampling for HPV testing in elderly women should not be solely used, it could be offered as a complement to professionally collected samples.  


References