P17-05ANAL CANCER SCREENING: CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTICIPANTS WHO USED TWO HANDS FOR A SELF- ANAL EXAMINATION (SAE)

08. Screening methods
O. Adegboyega 1, X. Zhang 2, L.Y. Hwang 2, S. Baraniuk 3, M. White 4, C. Elizabeth 5, H. Joseph 2, O. Nkechi 2, R. Michael 6, N. Alan 7.
1Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Texas (United States minor outlying islands), 2Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Texas (United States), 3Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Texas (United States), 4Gordon Crofoot MD PA, Houston, Texas (United States), 5Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (United States), 6University of Minnesota, Program in Human Sexuality, Minneapolis, Minnesota (United States), 7University of Minnesota, Program in Human Sexuality, Minneapolis, MinnesotaCenter for Infectious Diseases, Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Texas (United States)

Background / Objectives

Anal cancer is primarily caused by human papillomavirus infections and its highest incidence is among men who have sex with men. Since there is no standard screening protocol for anal cancer, a phase II screening study was conducted on the feasibility of self-anal cancer screening. It is important to palpate 360 degrees of the anal canal and we assumed it would require two hands for a single person to accomplish this; thus, participants were encouraged to use two hands for self-palpation of the anal canal if necessary.


Methods

Data for 113 single participants were analysed. Participants who did SAE after training by a clinician were asked, using computer-assisted self-interview, to answer if they palpated the anal canal using two hands or one hand. We then compared the characteristics of those who reported using two hands with those who did not using chi square tests and multivariable analysis.


Results

Slightly less than one-third (31%) of participants used both hands for the SAE. Even so, 83% of men claimed to palpate 360 degrees of the anal canal.  Of those who examined themselves with both hands, 73% reported  previously inserting fingers into the anus for pleasure compared to 49% for those who used one hand (p=0.036). Knowledge of and self-efficacy with SAE technique, education and age were not significantly associated with using two hands. In multivariable analysis, compared to white men, African-American men had 63% lower odds of using both hands for the SAE vs. using one hand.


Conclusion

It is unclear if our assumption of the required use of two hands is correct for all persons, e.g., maybe it is possible to palpate the anal canal with index finger and opposable thumb. Knowing the characteristics of participants who followed directions may be important for tailoring patient education in the next phase of the study. Alternative ways to self-palpate the anal canal should be explored.


References