OC 12-08FIRST-VOID URINE AND PHYSICIAN-TAKEN SMEAR SHOW SIMILAR SENSITIVITY FOR THE DETECTION OF CIN2+ LESIONS

10. HPV testing
A. Leeman 1, M. Del Pino 2, A. Rodriguez 2, V. Vankerckhoven 3, K. Beyers 3, M. De Koeijer 3, M. De Koning 1, A. Torne 2, J. Ordi 4, W. Quint 1.
1DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Visseringlaan 25, 2288 ER Rijswijk (Netherlands), 2Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic Clínic—Institut d´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona (Spain), 3Novosanis, Bijkhoevelaan 32c, BE-21220 Wijnegem (Belgium), 4Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona (Spain)

Background / Objectives

To study the correlation between HPV detection using self-collected urine samples, brush-based self-samplers and physician-taken smears and to compare HPV detection in morning first-void urine to HPV detection in first-void urine from any hour during the day.


Methods

Women referred to a colposcopy clinic after an abnormal PAP-smear result were sent a device (Colli-Pee™, Novosanis, Wijnegem, Belgium) to collect first void-urine on the first urine of the morning of their colposcopy. A second first-void urine sample was collected during the visit, together with a physician-taken cervix smear, a brush-based self-sample (Evalyn brush™, Rovers Medical Devices B.V., Oss, The Netherlands) and a colposcopy directed biopsy. Urine samples, smear and brushes were tested with the analytically sensitive SPF10-DEIA-LiPA25version1 assay and the clinically validated GP5+/6+-EIA, with LMNX genotyping. Histological material was assessed by a local pathologist.


Results

Morning (U1) and afternoon (U2) urine samples, physician-taken smear (PTS) and brush based self-samples (SS) from 91 patients were analysed. All CIN3 lesions (N=6) were hrHPV positive in PTS, SS, U1 and U2 with both the SPF10-assay and the GP5+/6+-assay (Table 1).

The sensitivity for CIN2+ detection in PTS, SS, U1 and U2 with the SPF10 was 96.4%, 92.9%, 92.9% and 96.4% respectively (p>0.05). With the GP5+/6+ assay, the sensitivity was 78.6% in PTS, 82.1% in SS, 92.9% in U1 and 85.7% in U2 (p>0.05).

On genotype level, a substantial to almost excellent agreement was found between all samples (kappa 0.663-0.912), for both SPF10 and GP5+6+. When comparing the genotypes found in PTS to those found in urine samples, 12.6% of the samples were discordant when tested with SPF10 and 19.8% of the samples when tested with GP5+/6+. For the comparison between SS and urine, discordant results were found in 10.0% and 14.3% of the samples, respectively. When comparing PTS to SS, 11.0% of the samples were discordant with SPF10 and 16.5% with GP5+/6+. Between U1 and U2, 3.2% were discordant with SPF10 and 6.6% with GP5+/6+.

Table 1: Positivity for SPF10 and GP5+/6+ assay in physician taken smear(PTS), brush-based self-sample (SS), morning first-void urine (U1) and first-void urine from any hour of the day (U2)
Histological diagnosis PTS PTS SS SS U1 U1 U2 U2
  SPF10 GP5+/6+

SPF10

GP5+/6+

SPF10

GP5+/6+

SPF10

GP5+/6+
Negative (46) 56.6% 47.8% 56.5% 50.0% 58.7% 45.7% 63.0% 52.2%
CIN1 (17) 82.4% 82.4% 82.4% 76.5% 82.4% 76.5% 82.4% 70.6%
CIN2 (22) 95.5% 72.7% 90.9% 77.3% 90.9% 90.9% 95.5% 81.8%
CIN3 (6) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Total 67 58 66 59 60 60 70 60

 

 


Conclusion

CIN2+ detection using HPV testing in first-void urine seems feasible, with sensitivity similar to the sensitivity of the physician-taken smears and brush-based self-samples. No advantage in testing morning first-void urine over first-void urine from later during the day was found.


References