P12-03ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF P16 IN THE INTER AND INTRA OBSERVER CONCORDANCE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA OF CERVIX GRADE 2 (CIN2)

12. Molecular markers
A. Forteza 1, J.E. Serra 1, G. Matheu 1, J.J. Torres 2, J. Cortes 3.
1Pathology Department. Hospital Universitario Son Espases. Palma. (Spain), 2Pathology Department. Hospital Son Llàtzer. Palma. (Spain), 3Private Practice, Palma. (Spain)

Background / Objectives

The histological classification of the pre-neoplastic lesions of the cervix contemplates three categories, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 1, 2 and 3. This classification is based on a subjective assessment of the thickness of the affected epithelium: CIN1 is considered the affectation of a third or less, while the thickness of the affected epithelium in CIN3 affects more than two-thirds of its thickness. It is established that the really pre-cancerous lesion is the CIN3. But between CIN1 and CIN3 we have the CIN2, an equivocal diagnosis, given the established very low inter-observer agreement to establish its diagnosis, about 30% according to data available in the literature.

We have today a biomarker, the p16, a marker of viral integration, which can objectify the diagnosis of CIN2 and, consequently, improve its concordance and diagnostic safety.

To assess inter and intra-observer agreement in the diagnosis of CIN 1 - 2 and 3, and to study how the use of the p16 modifies these values.


Methods

We collected 100 biopsies of cervix diagnosed with CIN2 from our records between 1997 and 2007. We performed p16 in all of them.

In a first phase, three expert pathologists evaluated 297 cervix biopsies, including cases of CIN2 randomly inserted along with cases of CIN 1, CIN 3 and invasive carcinoma of the cervix. They have subsequently analyzed p16 separately. In a third phase, the CIN2 biopsies have been passed along with their corresponding p16 for assessment and diagnosis. To conclude, 150 of the 297 biopsies were randomly selected to evaluate inter-observer agreement.


Results

The final results of the work will be presented at the Congress.


Conclusion

The final results of the work will be presented at the Congress.


References

Darragh, T et al. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: Background and Consesus Recommendations From the College of American Society for Colposcopu and Cervical Pathology. Journal Of Lower Anogenital Tract Disease. 2012; 16: 205-242.

Galgano et al. American Journal of surgical Pathology. 2010; 34: 1077-1086

Reusenbach M et al. p16 Immunohistochemistry in Cervical Biopsy Specimens. A systematic Review and MetaAnalysis of the Interobserver Agreement. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 2014; 142: 767-772

Klaes et al. p16 Inmmunohistochemistry Improves Interobserver Agreement in the Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2002; 26(11) 1389-99.

Bergeron et al. The clinical impact of using p16 immunochemistry in cervical histopathology and cytology. An update of recent developments. International Journal of Cancer. 2015; 136: 2741-51