SS 12-01Evidence from post-vaccination studies in high-income countries

36. Public health
M. Drolet 1, E. Bénard 1, M.C. Boily 2, H. Ali 3, L. Baandrup 4, V. Baldo 5, H. Bauer 6, S. Beddows 7, J. Brotherton 8, D. Callander 3, E. Chow 9, T. Cummings 10, B. Donovan 3, S. Deeks 11, C. Dehlendorff 4, J. Dillner 12, E. Dunne 13, C. Fairley 9, E. Flagg 13, J. Gargano 13, C. Harrison 14, A. Johnson 15, J. Kahn 16, K. Kavanagh 17, S. Kjaer 4, E. Kliewer 18, P. Lemieux-Mellouki 1, B. Liu 19, L. Markowitz 13, D. Mesher 7, L. Niccolai 20, M. Nygard 21, J. Oliphant 22, G. Ogilvie 23, K. Pollock 24, M. Smith 25, A. Soderlund Strand 26, K. Soldan 7, P. Sonnenberg 15, P. Sparen 12, S. Tabrizi 27, C. Tanton 15, R. Van Tielen 28, C. Wheeler 29, P. Woestenberg 30, N. Yu 31, M. Brisson 1.
1Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval (Canada), 2Imperial College (United Kingdom), 3The Kirby Institute (Australia), 4Danish Cancer Society Research Centre (Denmark), 5University of Padua (Italy), 6STD Control Branch of the California Department of Public Health (United States), 7Public Health England (United Kingdom), 8The University of Melbourne (Australia), 9Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (Australia), 10Indiana University School of Medicine (United States), 11Public Health Ontario (Canada), 12Karolinska Institutet (Sweden), 13Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (United States), 14Sydney School of Public Health (Australia), 15University College London (United Kingdom), 16University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (United States), 17University of Strathclyde (United Kingdom), 18CancerCare Manitoba (Canada), 19University of New South Wales (Australia), 20Yale University (United States), 21Cancer Registry of Norway (Norway), 22Auckland Sexual Health Service (New Zealand), 23BC Centre for Disease Control (Canada), 24Health Protection Scotland (United Kingdom), 25Cancer Council NSW (Australia), 26Laboratory Medicine Skane (Sweden), 27The Royal Women’s Hospital (Australia), 28MLOZ (Belgium), 29University of New Mexico (United States), 30RIVM (Netherlands), 31University of Manitoba (Canada)

Background / Objectives

Since 2007, 75 countries have implemented human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programmes. It is important to examine whether the promising results from pre-licensure randomised clinical trials and predictions from mathematical models are materialising in the real world. We summarised the most recent evidence about the population-level effects of girls-only HPV vaccination programmes among girls/young women targeted for vaccination, older women, and boys/men on anogenital warts (AGW) and high-grade cervical lesions(CIN2+).


Methods

We searched Medline and Embase (2007/01/01–2016/12/16) for studies presenting changes in HPV-related outcomes between pre- and post-vaccination periods. We stratified all analysis by age/sex and performed subgroup analyses to identify the main sources of heterogeneity.  We used random-effect models to derive pooled relative risk estimates.


Results

We identified 48 eligible studies from 11 high-income countries. We identified that the overall proportion of females vaccinated in the different countries (considering both vaccination coverage and number of cohorts vaccinated) was an important source of heterogeneity. Therefore, we categorised countries as having a medium/high proportion of females vaccinated (coverage ≥50% and multi-cohort vaccination) or a low proportion of females vaccinated (coverage <50% and/or single-cohort vaccination). In countries with a medium/high proportion of females vaccinated, there was a rapid and significant decline of AGW among girls/women <30 years old and boys/men <25 years old, and significant decreases in CIN2+ among girls <20 years old. Decreases in CIN2+ were also observed among women 20-24 years old after 5 years of vaccination. In countries with a low proportion of females vaccinated, significant decreases in AGW were observed after 3-4 years of vaccination among girls/women <25 years old, but there were no significant decreases among older women, and boys/men.


Conclusion

Ten years after the implementation of HPV vaccination, the promising results of randomised trials are materialising in the real world. We observed significant decreases in AGW and CIN2+ and strong herd effects, particularly in countries with a high proportion of females vaccinated. Additional surveillance data is required to examine the incremental effectiveness of gender-neutral vs girls-only vaccination programmes and the population-level impact of reduced dose schedules. 


References