P12-06CLINICAL UTILITY OF p16INK4a AS A DIAGNOSTIC ADJUNCT FOR UNDERLYING CIN2+ CERVICAL LESIONS

12. Molecular markers
A. Ferrera Boza 1, W. Valladares 1, O. Henriquez 2.
1School of Microbiology, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Honduras (Honduras), 2School of Medicine, Universidad Tecnologica Centroamericana (Honduras)

Background / Objectives

 In Honduras, premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix continues to represent a major burden on the health care system mainly due to decreased specificity of screening tests as well as significant interobserver variability in the diagnosis of these lesions.  Since p16INK4a is a surrogate marker of HPV E7-mediated pRb catabolism, it has been successfully deployed for the classification of HPV-related disease.  This study aimed to assess the clinical significance of overexpression of p16INK4a in cervical lesions. 


Methods

To help delineate the utility of p16INK4a, colposcopy-directed biopsy samples drawn from a larger study (n = 20: negative, 9; CIN I, 3; CIN II, 8) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of p16INK4a. Testing for high-risk human papillomavirus types by Hybrid Capture2 and genotyping by L1 HPV region PCR (GP5/6+) followed by reverse hybridization (LiPA) was performed on concurrent cervical scrape specimens. 


Results

 None of the negative and CIN I cases (n=12) expressed the p16INK4a protein.   On the other hand, all CIN II specimens (n=8) were positively associated with p16INK4a expression and high-risk HPV presence (P < .001), showing a sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 75.7-100.0). The  HPV prevalence in the negative and CIN I cases was 50% as opposed to 100% of CIN II cases.  The viral types identified in the CIN II cases were 16, 18, 35, 58, 51 and 66, being HPV16 the most common.  


Conclusion

 Although a small sample size, our findings show a possible utility for adjunct p16 INK4a in addition to HR- HPV testing to distinguish between negative/low-grade (CIN 1) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN II+) to avoid overtreatment of false-positive cases and under treatment of false-negative cases. It is suggested to test a larger sample size to increase the statistical significance of the study.

 


References