P05-07CROSS-PROTECTIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF AS04-HPV-16/18 VACCINATION IN REDUCING CERVICAL HPV INFECTIONS IN ADOLESCENT GIRLS – RESULTS FROM A COMMUNITY-RANDOMIZED TRIAL

05. HPV prophylactic vaccines
M. Lehtinen 1, D. Apter 2, T. Eriksson 1, K. Natunen 1, J. Paavonen 3, S. Damaso 4, D. Bi 4, F. Struyf* 4.
1University of Tampere, Tampere (Finland), 2VL-Medi Clinical Research Center, Helsinki (Finland), 3Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and University of Helsinki, Helsinki (Finland), 4GSK, Wavre (Belgium)

Background / Objectives

Aside of the high protection against the most prevalent carcinogenic HPV types (16/18) provided by the AS04-adjuvanted HPV-16/18 vaccine (AS04-HPV-16/18v), large efficacy trials have evidenced its protective effect against some non-vaccine oncogenic types. We present results from a post-hoc analysis on cross-protective vaccine effectiveness (VE) against non-vaccine HPV type cervical infections in adolescent girls from a large phase III/IV, community-randomized, controlled study (NCT00534638).


Methods

From 2007 to 2010, 22,444 girls and 11,968 boys from Finland born 1992-95 (aged 12-15 years) were allocated to 3 arms. Around ninety percent of vaccinated girls and boys in arm A (8,235/9,203) and of vaccinated girls in arm B (6,601/7,367) received AS04-HPV-16/18v. Other vaccinated subjects in arms A and B (6,614) and all in arm C (10,724) received hepatitis B virus vaccine.

HPV DNA prevalence of 14 high-risk and 11 low-risk types in cervical samples collected from female subjects when they were 18.5-19 years old was determined by SPF-10 line probe assay (LiPA) and Multiplex Type-specific PCR.

VE was calculated as a relative reduction of HPV prevalence by type in cervical samples among HPV-vaccinated girls from pooled arms A & B compared with non HPV-vaccinated girls from arm C (control arm). The analysis was performed on the total enrolled cohort (TEC), overall and by birth cohort (92-93 and 94-95), accounting for the differences in average age at vaccination (14-15 and 13-14 years old) and time to follow-up (3-4 and 5-6 years).


Results

VE are presented for HPV-31, 33, 35 and 45 (no significant changes were shown for other types).

HPV type TEC Arm N n VE (%) 95% CI (LL-UL) p-value
31 Overall A&B 5,853 51 81.1 70.7–87.8 <0.001
C 3,168 140
92-93 A&B 3,075 26 79.3 62.1–88.7 <0.001
C 1,635 64
94-95 A&B 2,778 25 80.3 68.1–87.8 <0.001
C 1,533 76
33 Overall A&B 5,853 121 47.4 29.2–60.9 <0.001
C 3,168 124
92-93 A&B 3,075 74 43.5 19.9–60.1 0.001
C 1,635 69
94-95 A&B 2,778 47 53.0 26.3–70.1 0.001
C 1,533 55
35 Overall A&B 5,853 43 54.2 30.0–70.0 <0.001
C 3,168 50
92-93 A&B 3,075 27 43.0 -1.6–68.1 0.057
C 1,635 25
94-95 A&B 2,778 16 65.1 27.2–83.3 0.005
C 1,533 25
45 Overall A&B 5,853 24 74.6 55.5–85.5 <0.001
C 3,168 52
92-93 A&B 3,075 15 70.4 38.4–85.8 0.001
C 1,635 26
94-95 A&B 2,778 9 75.9 47.1–89.0 <0.001
C 1,533 26

CI: confidence interval; LL-UL: lower and upper limits; N: number of subjects; n: number of positive samples; TEC: total enrolled cohort; VE: vaccine effectiveness

All analyses are exploratory.  CI and p-value are based on Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering and stratified by the historical HPV-16/18 seroprevalence used in the randomization.


Conclusion

Cross-protective effectiveness of AS04-HPV-16/18v against non-vaccine HPV type (31/33/35/45) cervical infections was observed in adolescent girls 3-6 years post vaccination. Protection appeared higher in younger birth cohorts.


References

Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA

*On behalf of the HPV-040 study group