Self-sampling

• P 10-01 • Social economic determinants for cervical cancer screening non-attenders offered HPV self-sampling as an alternative to ordinary screening: Who accepted and who did not? > M. Marie Vik Hessner • P 10-02 • Performance of 6 methylation markers tested on self-collected dry samples – feasibility study > L. Lara Klischke • P 10-03 • COMPARISON BETWEEN THE SELF-SAMPLING AND URINE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF HPV IN HIGH RISK POPULATION OF OUR MEDIUM > G. GABRIEL Fiol Ruiz • P 10-04 • ACCURACY OF URINARY HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TESTING AMONG WOMEN REFERRED FOR TREATMENT OF CERVICAL LESIONS: A TECHNICAL PILOT STUDY > M. Maarit LEINONEN • P 10-05 • EVALUATION OF THE INNO-LiPA HPV GENOTYPING EXTRA II ON UCM PRESERVED FIRST-VOID URINE > G. Geert Jannes • P 10-06 • USABILITY OF THE COLLI-PEE: A FIRST-VOID URINE SELF-SAMPLING DEVICE > T. Tine Provinciael • P 10-07 • WILL HPV SELF-SAMPLING DIMINISH THE SOCIAL INEQUALITIES IN THE FLEMISH CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAM? > E. Eliane Kellen • P 10-08 • PREVALENCE OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS ON THE HANDS OF HEALTH PROFESSIONALS > J. João Borges-Costa